Ghamidi explains his differences with Parwez.
Just sharing two sides of the issue to show where Parwezâ€™s critics are coming from!
Interesting thing he said that Parwez â€œinvented a new version of Arabic!â€
Is this not how most traditionalists react? The issue is that if a version of Islam being administered as Medicine is not curing the Ummah why would someone not sit up and ask questions? And questions which are drastically different (Like Parwez would ask)?
Parwez referenced numerous classical Arabic sources and picked the most appropriate, intellectual and rational meanings. This is not inventing Arabic.
His critics cannot stomach him questioning their absurd beliefs based on their twisted understanding of the Qur'an.
Step back, read what both sides have to say without bias and Parwez stands out whilst the others have their falsehoods eaten like those snakes.